© 2026 Ruth Newman Architect. All rights reserved. | Registered Architect NSW ARB No. 5601 | ARBV No. 800592 | Privacy Policy.
© 2026 Ruth Newman Architect. All rights reserved. | Registered Architect NSW ARB No. 5601 | ARBV No. 800592 | Privacy Policy.

The original home on this site was a 1960s cottage, built to face its own back yard and make the most of the land. It suited the era it was built in. It didn’t suit a young family. There was no clear front door, the house turned its back on the street, and the western sun ran straight into the living spaces through summer. The owners wanted a modern home that worked for young children and would keep working for the family for years, without giving up what the back yard already gave them.
The complication was the existing footprint. The cottage already sat outside the current setback controls, so before a single new room was drawn, the site was non-complying. The family wanted more space and a proper street entry, but the land couldn’t legally grow outward. On paper that left two unattractive options: demolish the cottage and rebuild something that complied, or keep the additions inside the compliant envelope and hand back most of the space the family came for.

The instinct on a non-complying site is to either start again or shrink the brief to fit the rules. We did neither.
The decision was to hold the existing footprint exactly as it was, and find the extra space without extending the building’s reach on the land. That kept the project inside the numbers that actually protect a neighbourhood. The floor space ratio complied. The landscape ratio complied. And because the footprint never moved, the neighbours’ views and privacy were untouched.
That gave Council a variation it could approve. The setbacks didn’t meet the standard, but the design met the purpose behind the standard. No overshadowing, no loss of views, no loss of privacy, no reduction in landscaped area.

The additions were approved and built. The house got its front door, a clear entry from the street where there hadn’t been one, and protection from the western sun the original cottage never had. What had been a 1960s cottage facing the wrong way became a modern family home, built for young children and the years ahead, on the same footprint it started with.
If you’ve got a home with potential but no clear direction, that’s exactly where we start.
A 1960s cottage with no front door.
Setbacks that didn’t comply before a single new wall was drawn.
A family who needed more space, not less.
The footprint couldn’t grow, so it didn’t. The space came from working within it, and the variation was approved on its merits.
ServicesConcept Development, Design, & DocumentYearCompleted in 2012